Search
Close this search box.

Biden Administration International Affairs Personnel Tracker

Eric Lander

Presidential Science Advisor, Director of the OSTP

An influential geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician, Dr. Lander has won many awards and recognitions for his work in mapping and discovering the human genome. Among other former positions, Dr. Lander was a leader in the international Human Genome Project (1990-2003) and served as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) for President Barack Obama (2009-2017). He was a professor of biology at MIT, professor of systems biology at Harvard Medical School, and President and Founding Director of the Board Institute at MIT and Harvard before going on leave in 2021 to serve at the White House.

Dr. Lander was nominated for the position on January 16, 2021 and held his Senate confirmation hearing on April 29, 2021. The Senate Commerce Committee advanced his nomination to the full Senate on May 20, 2021 and was confirmed unanimously by the Senate on May 28, 2021. He was sworn in on June 2, 2021.

On China

While a prolific researcher and writer on the topic of the human genome, Lander did not appear to have any published opinions on China or the U.S.-China relationship prior to being sworn in June 2, 2021.

Since officially joining the Administration, Lander’s comments have prioritized clarity in international research collaborations, reducing xenophobia as it relates to scientific collaboration, and supporting global cooperation in the purpose of scientific pursuits. In a interview with Nature, Lander did comment on the “damaged scientific partnership” with China and others over research espionage:

…We have to balance two things: we have to get research security right, and we have to make sure we really take advantage of the full power of international scientific collaboration and the fact that so many great people want to come to the United States [to work and study]. We can get those things right with clear guidance about disclosure of information….

And such concerns appear to have remained on his mind. On January 4, 2022, the National Science and Technology Council–of which Lander is the Chair–released a new ‘guidance’ document to build a new system to clarify how and when American scientists should report collaborative work with foreign governments or counterparts. In his Foreword to the report, Lander notes: 

The research security challenges we face are real and serious: some foreign governments, including China’s government, are working hard to illicitly acquire our most advanced technologies. This is unacceptable.

At the same time, if our policies to address those actions significantly diminish our superpower of attracting global scientific talent — or if they fuel xenophobia against Asian Americans — we will have done more damage to ourselves than any competitor or adversary could. So we need a thoughtful and effective approach.

Dr. Lander does have a record of working with Chinese scientists, such as Feng Zhang, PhD. In March 2019, Lander co-led a group–with Dr. Feng Zhang and Canadian bioethicist Dr. Françoise Baylis–of international scientists from seven countries who called for a temporary, global moratorium on heritable genome editing. This infers that Dr. Lander recognizes and values international collaboration.

Letter from President-elect Joseph R. Biden to Eric Lander, January 20, 2021

President Roosevelt asked Dr. Bush to consider four specific questions. Today, I am tasking you and your colleagues with five. My hope is that you, working broadly and transparently with the diverse scientific leadership of American society and engaging the broader American public, will make recommendations to our administration on the general strategies, specific actions, and new structures that the federal government should adopt to ensure that our nation can continue to harness the full power of science and technology on behalf of the American people.

In his position, Lander does operate as a top science representative of the U.S. to the world. His work is not purely domestic-focused and, like his colleagues, he often emphasizes the importance of global cooperation on climate innovation. For example, in early November 2021 Lander met with Canada’s Innovation and Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne when he was in Washington. Lander was also among the delegations that President Biden brought to the UN Climate Summit in November 2021 and to the Summit for Democracy in December 2021. 

He and his office have also directly linked technology and global democratic values, with the December 2021 launch of the International Grand Challenges on Democracy-Affirming Technologies. The announcement did not mention China by name.

We can and should harness innovation to advance technologies that have the potential to further our shared democratic values, including privacy, freedom of expression, access to information, transparency, fairness, inclusion, and equity.

It’s not a guarantee that any given technology will support democratic values. It takes constant vigilance, and constant commitment; we, the people, have to make sure that technology is developed responsibly and used responsibly. That is our solemn obligation.

Notable Speeches & Commentary

While a prolific researcher and writer on the topic of the human genome, Dr. Lander did not appear to have any published opinions directly on China or the U.S.-China relationship prior to his official confirmation on May 28, 2021.

  • On December 14, 2021, Lander gave remarks at The American Geophysical Union Fall 2021 Meeting in Louisiana, in which he named China a competitor in the ‘clean energy revolution’ and emphasized the need for urgency on the climate crisis.

I know there are still some — including in the U.S. Congress — who are not convinced of the urgency of addressing the climate crisis. To them, I say: Let’s agree we want the clean energy revolution to happen here — so that we reap the economic benefits and don’t end up buying the energy technologies of the future from our competitors — like China — who we know are investing heavily. Let’s work together to accelerate this progress.

  • On December 8, 2021, in conjunction with the Summit for Democracy, Lander and his office announced the launch of of the International Grand Challenges on Democracy-Affirming Technology.
  • On October 12, 2021, speaking at the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual Science and Technology Policy Forum, Lander directly linked the thoughts behind his and Deputy Director Nelson’s October 8 WIRED publication to international competition, highlighting the importance of factoring China’s large population into the equation:

If we are not fielding the whole team — if half the team or a third of the team, only a fifth of the team is on the field — there is no way we can compete.

It has become clear, though, that some foreign governments, including the Chinese government, are working vigorously to illicitly acquire, and in some cases outright steal, U.S. research and technology. There have been efforts to induce American scientists to secretively conduct research programs on behalf of foreign governments or to inappropriately disclose non-public results from research funded by U.S. government sources. Such threats are real, serious, and completely unacceptable.

We thus have to guard against abuses and protect intellectual property rights — without undermining the openness that is central to both scientific discovery and our national character.

In the same post, Lander finished by stating the importance of creating policies that do not fuel xenophobia.

We have to assiduously avoid basing policies or processes on prejudice—including those that could fuel anti-Asian sentiments or xenophobia…

In designing policies, we should also avoid actions that are pointless or performative, such as requiring scientists to return honorary degrees from Chinese universities. And, it should never be acceptable to target scientists for investigation based on their race or ethnicity. In protecting our nation, we must uphold its fundamental values.

But today, America’s future depends on science and technology like never before. We have amazing opportunities ahead, but also face unprecedented challenges—from pandemics, to the climate crisis, to international competition in the technologies of the future.

  • On his first day in office, June 2, 2021, Lander held an interview with Nature magazine that included a question about China: “Scientists say that measures the US government has taken against research espionage have damaged scientific partnerships, especially with China. How will you address this?” Lander gave the following response:

It’s not acceptable if countries engage in industrial espionage to take intellectual property. I think we all agree on that. The question is, how do you manage that in a way that is effective — addresses the problem, but doesn’t create huge burdens, doesn’t create a sense of turning away international collaboration, and doesn’t promote racism and anti-Asian feelings?

We have to balance two things: we have to get research security right, and we have to make sure we really take advantage of the full power of international scientific collaboration and the fact that so many great people want to come to the United States [to work and study]. We can get those things right with clear guidance about disclosure of information. And that’s certainly going to be a role for this office — to look after both sides of that equation.

Media Commentary & Public Perceptions

Calling for a “revolution in greenhouse gas measurement”, Lander said that the US, EU, France, Japan and China had launched, or were planning, new satellite projects to provide “sensitive, frequent, high-resolution data covering the entire planet.”

Over the course of 2021, Lander has frustrated many colleagues by trying to insert himself into almost any science-related issue across the federal government, even if there’s only a tangential connection to his office.

He’s a disaster

President Biden’s pick for top government scientist will have to refrain from working on COVID vaccine matters until he divests as much as $1 million of stock in a company manufacturing one, the White House tells Axios.

The selection, and Biden’s decision to instantly elevate the role to Cabinet status, comes at a pivotal moment for the future of American science, and underscores the new administration’s pledge to place science at the center of government. Biden has set lofty expectations, introducing Lander as a researcher whose work “has changed the course of human history” and pledging that his science staff “will help restore your faith in America’s place on the frontier of science and discovery and hope.”

His nomination does not fill us with hope that he will shepherd the kind of transformation in science we need if we are to ensure science delivers equity and justice for all. We had high hopes that the Biden administration would continue its pattern of bold nominations when envisioning a newly elevated cabinet position of science adviser. There was certainly no shortage of options…

Originally trained as a mathematician, Lander is a powerful figure in US science circles and one of the most highly cited researchers in the world.

The appointments signal a drastic switch from the role of science in the Trump administration.

Page Last Updated: January 26, 2022

*None of the personnel in this tracker are associated with the Institute for China-America Studies. All images used on this page are sourced from the official Biden-Harris transition website buildbackbetter.gov or the public domain.*