Search
Close this search box.

November 15, 2024

Volume 4

Issue 23

ICAS Trade ‘n Tech Dispatch (online ISSN 2837-3863, print ISSN 2837-3855) is published about every two weeks throughout the year at 1919 M St NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC 20036.
The online version of ICAS Trade ‘n Tech Dispatch can be found at chinaus-icas.org/icas-trade-technology-program/tnt-dispatch/.

What's Been Happening

-1-

Trump Storms Back To White House, Announces Early Cabinet Picks

-1-

In One Sentence

  • Following a hard-fought contest in key swing states, Republican candidate Donald Trump secured a resounding victory in the 2024 Presidential Election, winning 312 electoral votes to Kamala Harris’ 226.
  • Susie Wiles, who was the co-chair of Trump’s election campaign in 2016 and 2024, has been appointed by Trump as his White House Chief of Staff.
  • Rep. Mike Waltz, who is a Green Beret veteran, served in Afghanistan, and was a Member of the House’s Armed Services, Foreign Affairs and Intelligence committees, is to serve as the next National Security Adviser. 
  • Kristi Noem, currently serving as the Governor of South Dakota, has been nominated to be the next Secretary of Homeland Security, and Robert Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic, as the next Secretary of Health and Human Services.
  • Florida Senator Macro Rubio is slated to be the next Secretary of State, FOX television channel presenter Pete Hegseth, the next Defense Secretary, and ex-Rep Tulsi Gabbard the next Director of National Intelligence.  
  • Regarding the potential appointment of Treasury Secretary, several of Trump’s advisers have backed Scott Bessent, founder of the hedge fund Key Square Group and a key financial supporter of Trump’s campaigns.
  • The Chinese Foreign Ministry extended its congratulations to Donald Trump on his election as the 47th U.S. President, stating that it “respects the choice of the American people.”
  • China’s President Xi Jinping congratulated Trump on his victory and underlined that the U.S. and China should find the “right way to get along with each other.”

Mark the Essentials

  • Following Trump’s victory, speculation has intensified regarding Robert Lighthizer’s potential return as U.S. Trade Representative (USTR). At present, no official confirmation has been made regarding the appointment, and he may even return in a position as trade and export control czar that sits atop USTR.
  • Senator Marco Rubio, the nominee for Secretary of State, has a longstanding record of taking hardline stances on China. He previously sponsored the Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act and has pushed for stricter export controls, higher tariffs on Chinese critical minerals, the removal of Chinese goods from de minimis protections, and the exclusion of vehicles with Chinese components from the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
  • Similarly, Rep. Mike Waltz, who has been nominated as National Security Advisor, holds an aggressive stance on China. Waltz has advocated for a “whole-of-government approach for R&D” to counter China’s threats to U.S. security and currently sits on the House China Select Committee. 
  • President-elect Donald Trump’s election victory is already influencing China’s economic policies. Analysts have suggested that Trump’s proposed tariff increases could potentially cause “huge damage” to China’s economy, prompting Beijing to consider the election outcome when determining the scale of its recent stimulus measures. Other analysts have mused that a potential “phase-two” deal between Beijing and the incoming Trump administration could lead to increased Chinese investment in the U.S., aligning with Trump’s emphasis on goods produced for American consumers being “produced in the U.S. using U.S. labor.” 
  • In response to Donald Trump’s election as U.S. President, South Korean Trade Minister Cheong In-kyo stated that South Korean companies should consider “increasing direct investment and on-site production” in the United States if tariffs are raised. Simultaneously, ministers from several countries, including Canada, Mexico, the European Union and Thailand, expressed their willingness to strengthen collaboration with the incoming administration.

Keeping an Eye On…

  • On January 20, 2025, the United States’ 45th president will also become its 47th president, with Donald Trump having swept his opposition across all the key battleground states. Trump won handsomely across several demographic segments—noncollege white folks; seniors; suburban voters—and gained important ground among Black and Latino male voters (although his popular vote tally budged upwards by a mere 1.5 million from 2020 to 75.6 million votes—Harris, by contrast, had an almost 9 million vote drop-off from Biden’s 81.2 million vote count). Ultimately, what lifted Trump and sank Harris was not just about Rust Belt jobs or socially conservative men from small-town America. Rather, it was about a cost-of-living challenge that cut across vast swathes of the American public, with inflation outpacing wage gains and leaving a significant number of Americans worse off than they were before the pandemic. Not until early 2024 did real median household incomes surpass its late-2019 number. By contrast, the first three years of Trump’s first presidency witnessed a double-digit rise in the median household income, with wages growing faster than at any time over the preceding Bush and Obama terms. There is a certain irony here for the Democrats to think through. In 2016, Hillary Clinton’s defeat to Trump was ascribed in part to the Obama administration’s lack of emphasis on running a “high pressure economy,” i.e., running the economy temporarily hotter than cyclical macroeconomic indicators would advise so as to reverse the adverse supply side effects that stemmed from the economy’s structural shortfall in aggregate demand (remember the super-low and even negative interest rates of the time). Indeed, in a notable speech in 2016, the then-Federal Reserve Chair and current Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen had emphasized the importance of a quick, coordinated and aggressive fiscal and monetary policy response following a recession as well as the need of policymakers to adopt a more accommodative stance during recoveries than would otherwise be called for under the traditional view that the economy’s supply capacity is largely independent of demand. Both ideas were pressed into service during the Biden years to recreate a “high pressure economy.” A massive US$1.9 trillion stimulus package (the American Rescue Plan) was enacted in May 2021 (on top of the two large COVID-related Trump stimulus injections of 2020), the Federal Reserve maintained an accommodative stance initially even as inflation wildly overshot, and the U.S. government continues to run to this day a massive fiscal deficit that has no precedent in non-crisis periods during peacetime. The “high pressure economy” did deliver solid growth and employment gains. It also delivered inflation, high interest rates, depressed real wages and a cost-of-living crisis, which were exacerbated no doubt by COVID supply chain snafus and Russia aggression-induced commodity price spikes. In the end, the “high pressure economy” delivered no better for Kamala Harris electorally than the demand-deficient economy did for Hillary Clinton. Be that as it may, America will come to rue in time the departure of the Biden team from office. Not since the Depression-era Great Deal programs did America have such an opportunity to spur the creation of major new industries, resurrect private investment, reimagine antitrust regulation to combat oligopolistic market concentration risks, and rejigger capitalism’s tools more broadly for socially inclusive ends. It is not clear now that some of the industrial policy and antitrust innovations will survive the second Trump administration or whether these introduced policies will have enough staying power to outlive Trump 2.0 and be resurrected under a future Democratic Party administration. At the end of the day, though, the American voter has spoken, and that voice must be respected.

Expanded Reading

-2-

Xi Jinping To Meet Joe Biden in Peru; China Pumps Out Fresh Stimulus

-2-

In One Sentence

  • Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Joe Biden are scheduled to meet during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Lima, Peru, which is currently ongoing and runs through November 16. 
  • During his APEC swing, President Xi will also inaugurate a new Chinese-built megaport port in Chancay near Lima, which would add to Peru’s credentials as an important resource-rich region and trade center in South America.
  • Domestically, Beijing announced a US$1.4 trillion package to help clear up local government debt overhangs and stabilize economic growth.

Mark the Essentials

  • Following Trump’s election victory, President Biden faces a difficult challenge of credibility at the upcoming APEC Economic Leaders Meeting, given his status as a lame-duck president of the defeated party. Regarding the U.S.-China relationship over the next four years, Danny Russel, a top official in the Obama administration, has argued that President Biden might need to convey some “practical points” to his assembled counterparts, given the high likelihood of the Trump administration’s tariff increases.
  • Beijing’s latest stimulus program proposes to increase—and implement—the local government debt limit by 6 trillion yuan over a three-year period as well as allocate an additional 800 billion yuan in local government special bonds every year over five years. Chinese Finance Minister Lan Fo’an stated that these measures will assist local governments in reducing “hidden debt,” projecting a decrease from 14.3 trillion yuan at the end of 2023 to 2.3 trillion yuan by 2028.   
  • After Beijing’s announcement of its new fiscal stimulus package, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index closed down 1.5 % on November 11. Some analysts suggest that “investors are unwinding bullish bets as they feel the major [fiscal stimulus] event is over and they are a bit let down.” Concurrently, China’s central bank set the renminbi’s trading midpoint at RMB 7.18 per dollar, marking its lowest level in a year and a 0.5% decrease from the previous fix. Several economists underlined that markets’ primary concern remains the package’s relative lack of effectiveness in boosting consumption and demand.  
  • On November 5, 2024, at the opening of the China International Import Expo in Shanghai, Chinese Premier Li Qiang highlighted Beijing’s capacity to “drive sustained economic improvement,” adding that the government has “ample space for fiscal policy and monetary policy.” He also reaffirmed China’s commitment to achieving an economic growth of around 5 %.

Keeping an Eye On…

  • Economic stimulus was never priority #1 for the Chinese government…and it shows. With the post-COVID economic bounce failing to materialize, the government had chosen in 2023 to go down the harder path of implementing business operating-environment reforms rather than simply throwing cheap stimulus money at the problem. Its hand was forced nonetheless this September when third quarter data showed that one of the economy’s last growth motors, fixed asset investment in industrial upgrading and high-tech manufacturing, was losing momentum. This was on top of anemic consumer spending and six consecutive quarters of deeply embedded deflationary pressures. And hence the Party Politburo’s decision on September 26 to implement a package of measures to stimulate the economy. The monetary policy loosening and capital market support measures have been intelligently devised, are ambitious, and are already being implemented. By contrast, the fiscal stimulus support measure—a one-off large issuance of central government debt to pay off local government “hidden debt” and the issuing of special treasury bonds to replenish the core tier-one capital of China’s six big commercial banks—are disappointing and somewhat misdirected. It will do nothing to enforce a hard budget constraint on China’s banking sector, which bears greater resemblance in terms of credit quality assessment to its third world peers than the modern and advanced financial intermediation system that China deserves. Worse, the fiscal measures constitute a missed golden opportunity to build out China’s social protection system and thereby buttress the consumption potential of the economy (it is not that there are no demand side measures; there is important fiscal support intended to stabilize and optimize the housing sector). Given Xi Jinping’s long-term rather than short-termist focus, the government should have increased the basic pension and the subsidy towards basic medical insurance premiums for the vast majority of poor retirees and rural adults who sit at the base of China’s shallow state-funded social protection pyramid. It is not clear that breaking the deflationary cycle is a priority either for the Chinese government (even though the focus on tackling the bad debt issue is a correct one). Rather, the government wants to do just enough, it seems, to prevent deflation from tightening its grip, which is not a terribly smart way to anchor inflationary expectations. The fiscal measures appear set to deliver the economy to the (arbitrary) “around 5%” growth target envisaged at the beginning of the year, as well as clear local government balance sheets to enable them to juice-up capital investments in China’s ‘new quality productive force’ industries. The economic stimulus is a domestic matter. Its focus disproportionately however on stimulating the supply side of the Chinese economy could invite blowback down the line. It will fuel excess capacity which, willy-nilly, will have to be unloaded in foreign markets, which will aggravate the already-high trade tensions. It could make it harder for the macroeconomy to exit deflation. And there are no guarantees that local governments will use the space opened up on their balance sheets to make wise future investment decisions. Rather, the odds are that the funds would be wastefully sprayed on industrial policy-related guidance funds to conjure up the next-generation provincial superstar firms (and provincial revenue source), much like the wasteful spraying of infrastructure spending via the now-infamous local government investment vehicles that were structurally baked into the system. In which case, Beijing will have to shell out yet another stimulus package to nurse its next debt hangover. All-in-all, an important structural reform opportunity has gone abegging.

Expanded Reading

On the Hill

Election Results

  • Republicans secured a majority in the 2024 Senate election, winning 53 seats while Democrats now hold 47 seats. 
  • In the House of Representatives, Republicans also achieved a majority with 218 seats.
  • The control of both the Senate and the House will grant Republicans a more comfortable legislative environment to advance their policy agendas and bolster their incoming President’s authority.
  • Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI), who is the Chairman of the House Select Committee on the CCP, secured his seat in the House re-election against Michael Lynch.
  • The incumbent Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), failed to secure re-election against his Republican challenger, Bernie Moreno. 
  • Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, secured his Senate seat defeating Rep. Colin Allred (D-TX).
  • Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), a Member of the House Committee on the CCP and sponsor of numerous China related bills, will now represent the party in the Senate having won the election against Valerie McCray. 
  • Sen. John Thune (R-SD) is to be the new Senate Majority Leader, replacing Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

Mark the Essentials

  • David McCormick, the newly elected Republican senator from Pennsylvania, has proposed a “clear outbound investment regime” to cut off American investments in China’s technology development sector deemed critical to national security. He has also pushed for ending U.S. reliance on China for energy products such as solar panels and EV components.
  • Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), the new senator from Michigan, has called for a “formal national security review” of Chinese-connected vehicles and has advocated for limiting their entry into the U.S. market. 
  • Rep. John Curtis (R-UT), the new senator from Utah, has urged the imposition of tariffs on China to “force them to pay for their pollution and level the playing field.”
  • Former government officials and analysts suggest that although Trump has in the past shown a preference for personal diplomacy over institutionalized mechanisms, he will still need to engage Congress to advance his China policies. Trump’s aggressive policy proposals, especially concerning tariffs and outbound investment screening, will likely require legislative support in order to be implemented. This balancing act with Congress could determine whether the United States escalates toward economic confrontation or finds a path to ensure dialogue with China on issues such as tariff hikes and technology restrictions.

Keeping an Eye On…

  • The Republican Party’s victory in this year’s election cycle battle for Congress will have strong implications for the outlook for U.S.-China ties. With the GOP conquering all three branches of the American political system, Republican lawmakers will enjoy even greater leeway to push their legislative agendas during the incoming 119th Congress. The second Trump administration, which will only have four years to realize a full basket of Donald Trump’s MAGA dreams, will inevitably need to work closely with the incoming Congress to advance core domestic policies on taxes, tariffs and border security. In return, and following the trajectory of the 117th and 118th Congresses, the 119th Congress will likely continue to demand a greater participative role in the shaping of American foreign and economic policymaking, “fixing” trade policy, and countering China with even tougher measures. This GOP-driven 119th Congress will add another layer of complexity, if not tensions, to the fragile U.S.-China bilateral relationship.

Expanded Reading